Lore61 .
13/10/2005 20:57 and 5 + 7 = 12 which in time gives us 2012. And my head told me that this letter will be Lor61!
Dear Lor
We had meditation tonight at Carol again. Her theme tonight was fire. But there were a whole lot of new people pitching tonight. There was one girl that was there the previous time and she brought a friend along and the two of them made the evening for me very interesting – besides from the “vision” I received. Tonight I did not went off into my own “vision”, I was sitting there and thinking I am getting nothing when I started realizing but I must follow, for a change, the guided meditation. Well, I did follow it, sort of…
We started off on a huge mountain. And we had to take wood and make a fire. In my mind my head gave me the wood, but it was such a pile, it went straight into the cosmos until who knows where to. And I tried to make a fire, but the wood was so overwhelming that the fire was stalled before it could even began. Then I turned around and behind me was a man in light. It was sort of an oval light around this man – but it was the same man that gave me the sword at the first night’s meditation at Carols’. Then suddenly, I had the moon in my hands and there was an hourglass on the ground and I put the moon on the hourglass.
Then the stack of wood caught my attention again and a UFO came by and beamed a stroke of light onto this stack and it turned into very complicated structured wooden squared block pile – where each piece of the squared blocks had a pattern that fitted into the rest of the pile that made it up into the cosmos. And I took one out and it was an L that was upside down. Then I took another one out and it had two “legs” as like in when you look at the upside down L, the horizontal short side is one “leg”. And the third one I pulled out had three “legs”. All the legs was pointing from the vertical axis to the left. But if you view it, the vertical stick with the 2 “legs” could also be an “F” and the one with the three “legs” could also be resembling an “E”. So that gives us “L F E”. And looking at their positions in the English alphabet, the L is 12 or 3 and the F is 6 and the E is 5 or 365, the number of days of the year. And then Carol said we must think of a song, but even before she said that, the song of ABBA or 1221, came up – Happy New Year.
Then I heard Carol say we must sacrifice something, but for me nothing happened. Instead, the man in the light, had a picture that was his size of Ra, the Sun God. Then this picture turned into a mirror and the mirror cracked and in the cracks, was standing me – in my white vest T-shirt and my blue jeans.
Then Carol brought us back into the room and we had a discussion of the meditation. What for me was pretty amazing is that it seems the others had huge fires – I had none??? But I guess I must not try and fiddle it out or try to, it will probably be shown to me in a different way, why!
But I’ll speak to you again – it seems my head reckon the meditation was so pretty amazing that it is good enough to make up the special spot of Lor61 and did I find you on ad 61 or what? And if you view a 61 the 6 is a number of fire and the one a number of air – and did my wood for the fire(6) reached up into the air(1)??? It was very special, but I have a good feel about the people I met tonight as well…
LOVE
RENEE
13/10/2005 21:25 or (9)2005
SHAMANISM?
13/10/2005 22:55
Dear Lor
I also was now thinking of the Lotto ticket my father bought me yesterday night. The time was 19:09:10 or 19 and (0)9:1(0). And this 91 is after this afternoon, very significant for me. I realized this afternoon, as I was bothered with the little sample I have of what the Ancient Egyptians thought Ra to look like – and this is standing next to my lioness in action – that what Ra symbolize for me. The R is the 18th or 9 letter of the English alphabet and “A” is the first or 1, which gives us 91. And look at the time of the Lotto ticket…
But what I actually want to get at is the following: As this month is 10th and it is 2005 or a 1, 2, 5 and 000 it gives a 1 and 7 and 000 or 17. And for me the 17 is connected to the number 44 . So on this Lotto ticket, the 3rd row the 6th number or 36 is the number 44 . And the only 36 on this ticket is in row 4, the 4th number or 44 . This is actually the most amazing that can be made out of this lotto ticket – although there are more than just this, there are lots! But I think I will bore you with each and every one – it seems possibilities are endless tonight, do not know if I will be able to go to sleep.
But you were in more than just the fact that the letter about the meditation is written to you on spot Lor61 represented at the meditation tonight. As we were meditating, this one girl which I suspect is going to play a part in my life ahead still, reminded me of your daughter, the looks. And she’s the one who came to me afterwards and asked me if I have ever read a book about shamanism. I was surprised at her observation – as to where it comes from, as she looks so young still.
Anyway,…
LOVE
RENEE
13/10/2005 23:11 or 11:11. Are you guys still having nuts parties with entrance fees like R11,11? I never asked you before, but what did you guys do at that “nutty” party? I imagined you all sitting on blankets and having picnic and doing what? What do a lot of spiritual people do together when it is blue moon? Seems I have a lot to learn still. And did I have a moon in my meditation on an hourglass and the time ending this letter is 11:11??? Just asking…
IS THINKING ABOUT THOUGHTS OF THE PAST IN THE PAST?
15/10/2005 15:34 turning 35
Dear Lor
I am so bothered with this complicated ideas I cannot get a hold on. Like, if I am looking at the chair in front of me, am I viewing the “past” or am I viewing the “now” as light has to travel a certain distance and takes a certain time to travel that distance? To put it a better way: If tonight I am standing outside and there are no clouds in the sky and I am viewing the stars – I will be viewing something that is of the “past”. Why? Because the light from the stars take some time to travel the distance for us to be aware of that light, for that light to enter the retina of my eye or of a telescope for that matter. So, what does that leave me with? Am I in the now, but only on very micro scale viewing the “past”??? As I said before, light take some time to travel a certain distance. But what is the “now” then? Is the “now” then actually the vision of the past? According to science, sound also takes a certain time to travel a certain distance. Then the same is applicable to this, to sound. As does that mean when I am hearing something, it is actually something of the past? If I am sitting and thinking – I have explained to you some time ago that I sometimes experience my thoughts, or some of it, to actually coming from outside me. Does this then also mean that thoughts take a certain time to travel a certain distance? And what complications does this have? This leaves me with the third thing that I am experiencing as what I would call the “now”, but which is actually, because of the time things take to travel a certain distance, something of the “past”. Is there a “now” at all??? Could it be that the experience of this “past” stuff – putting it all together – could make up the “now”??? But this will mean that the “now” consist of the experience of “past” stuff??? If this is true, will I then be, if I am thinking about events of the past, thinking about thoughts of the past in the past???
I don’t know, I think I am confusing myself – but even before it was written, the idea in my head was something of the past, let alone being something of the past before I even experienced it.
LOVE
RENEE
15/10/2005 15:51 How accurate is this time, or is it only some numbers with some symbolism to it???
Ns. 16/10/2005 or 161 and (7) 16:47 or 4:47 or 44 and (7) but 16:47 also 16(1)(1)
Looking at the above question now from the back angle, we get the question: If we disregard the above conclusion by saying that we are experiencing a “now” – or that we are not in the “now” experiencing something of the “past”, then this means we are on the micro level disregarding the fact that light and sound take a certain time to reach a certain distance, and what is true on micro scale must then also apply to the macro scale – or that light from a certain star does not take a couple of million of years to reach the earth???? Or then, our other option is to view that we are not experiencing a “now”, but a “past”????
Is this a catch 22 situation (??)(??)
LOVE
RENEE
16/10/2005 16:56 or 16(1)(1).
AM I CONFUSED?
16/10/2005 11:18 and 1 + 8 = 9 which gives 11(9)
Dear Lor
My mother were talking about reality a while ago, and this upset me though I did not realize why initially. Then I went to lie down for a while and realized it is all these paradoxes about what we call reality!
The first one that comes up is what Karl Popper said, and this comes from the Burger of Yesterday, 15/10/2005, that what keeps science going is the fact that you get those for a concept and those against a concept – but don’t they realize that both are right as both exist? Then, if I look at the whole thing about atoms; If I am in relation to the atom as I am in relation to the earth, then the distance between the atom I am on and the other atoms, will be like when I am in relation to the earth and witnessing the stars. That will be the distance between where I am on the atom and other atoms. But where does this leaves us – with a question as to how is density, how are us, possible? Is this view of atoms then a paradox again as to our existence? Then the paradox of the “now” which I discussed yesterday in my previous letter. Where it seems that even what we experience as a in the moment, is paradoxic! Then there is the paradox of the occurance that space has no colour, but that the Universe has the appearance of “dark”? What is all this telling me??? All these paradoxes, but still, we are dense, we have an experience of a “in the moment” and we do want something to be either red or blue – we cannot accept both
This makes me think again of the Greek philosopher who wrote about the paradox that we are moving. He said that if you want to move a certain distance, you first have to complete half the distance. To complete half the distance, you first have to complete half of that distance and to complete this you need to complete half of that distance and so it goes on into eternity until you never start moving – but we are all seemingly moving around.
This makes me wonder if I am confused???
LOVE
RENEE
16/10/2005 11:32 or (1)(1)5 or 11(5) and I don’t have a clue what I am doing…
ns. 16/10/2005 13:05 or 13(5) – seems the above was 11(5) and this one is 13(5), as I do not know if this means something on a certain level (5)???
DOES SCIENCE REALIZE ITS CONFUSION?
Dear Lor
What I actually have been wondering about since I wrote the previous letter, is why there is paradoxes to every theory? I wonder if it could have something to do with a word that was invented called “sense”, as the opposite of “sense” is “no sense” – and have I left out an “n”???? How complicated can our reality then be? As certain things gets so confusing, all because another word/concept was invented??? How will science ever be able to put things together as the mere existence of certain words/concepts are confusing them without them realizing or having the awareness, of the existence of that confusion???
LOVE
RENEE
16/10/2005 13:13 – need I say more?
WHEN WILL WE BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND THE WORD "HAPPY"?
16/10/2005 19:39 or 19(1)(2) where the (1), for a first time, and the (2), for a second time.
Dear Lor
The words of “The Law of Opposites”, keep coming into my head, as my head told me that if I say I cannot do something, in time, I will be proved that I can do that thing.
And I have been wondering about that meditation I got on Thursday, the 13th , where I was led to the amount of days in a year – 365 days. This made me wonder if all the stuff I have been writing about in Lor61, has got something to do with days and as days make out a part of what we consider in the concept of time? But looking at that meditation, there has been a “Happy” new year. I wonder when are we going to be learning about that “Happy”???
LOVE
RENEE
16/10/2005 19:46 or 19(1) it seems there is a (1) or first in the end of this letter, but the (2) is only present in the beginning time…
16/10/2005 20:38 or 8(1)(1) and 8 or eternity in the (1) first time and the first of the (1) second one
Dear Lor
I just want to share with you something totally different that just happened now. I was lying in my room and thinking all by myself, sort of excluding my head, about possibilities of what I should do to earn a living. Then, out of the blue, my cell phone, which is not in use and which I only used to send sms’e with, went off with an sms.
It came from someone on the time 20, or 8pm thus giving 8:31:25 or (8)31 and the 25 connected to the date’s year, 2(0)(0)5. This gives us the level of eternity and the by now familiar combination 3 and 1. The number of this “person” I had to phone was:
072 3663 817 – and 7+2=9 and 3+6=9=6+3 and 9+8=17 which leaves us with (0)(9)17 17! And by now the combination of 17 is also familiar as it relates to “I will be ever greatly revealed”. After I phoned the number I realized but someone else is trying to get my attention…”Please call me”. It also advertise a long joke.
Well, let me end this letter on the note of a joke…
LOVE
RENEE
16/10/2005 20:49 or 20:13 and the beginning time was 20:11 and the end time is 20:13, so it seems the one not mentioned – which in some instances may be the important one as 11 figures and so does 13 – is 20:12 or 8(1)(2) This means that the first (1) is mentioned, but the second on the level of 8 – eternity – is not mentioned in the end time, a second time.
16/10/2005 21:11 or (9)11
Dear Lor
Just something else that was also very amazing today. Me and my mother were driving on the Chapman’s Peak Toll road from Noordhoek to Houtbay. The ticket we received conveyed the following details.
Time: 15:06:51
Transaction Number: 195529 and doesn’t 2+9 add up to 11…
Amount: 22
The amount, combined with the transaction number resemble 4(22)/11/1955
And looking at the time, I recall a night when you were doing some healing work on me when we started talking about 15. And I remember so well how you asked me if 1+5=6, if it is not a fire number? And my reply was that the combination of 15 (or then for that matter 51 as both are in the time) are both air numbers…
LOVE
RENEE
16/10/2005 21:18 or 9:9.